Then I will cancel my ifr in flight and then refile once I get close to my destination.Įven with ATC on its vastly different then FSX. Regarding performance - X-Plane can bring your system to its knees if you max out everything…so be realistic and play with the settings… The terrain can be upgraded by downloading and installing (quite easy) free HD and UHD meshes that really make the scenery pop: The scenery isn’t up to Orbx type quality or quantity yet - but I’ve found the default stuff to be adequate…but I’m not really much of a VFR guy except for the bush flying. And some of the free stuff is really good too. Some good names have been working on third party stuff (Carenado, Aerosoft, Level-D) but really there are already some really high quality payware devs out there. It is continuously upgraded by the developer…which is really nice. I would NOT buy a disc version (I have that) and it sucks that you can’t covert it to a digital version…so I’ll probably end up rebuying it on Steam at some point. It has a limited demo flying area…and I’m not sure if it still limits you for time…but it would be a good indicator before you buy. Absolutely, the X-Plane demo is free from what I can recall. Also I do believe you can down load the demo and do a test flight.Ī few quick comments though. If you do get X plane there is a bunch of stuff we can help with. I will say this there is something satisfying about landing a fully loaded 777 that is awesome. Flying a 777 isnt as intense as flying a A-10C in combat but it still has its moments. Once I learned more about the civilian flight stuff. The limited ATC made me learn a lot about SID/STARS and just flight planning in general. X Plane also forced me to learn about flight planning. Its a button pusher just like the DCS A-10C. I bought the excellent 777 by FlightFactor. I always loved combat sims and never saw the appeal of flying a 767. There is some very good freeware out there for X plane in the form of planes, But if you want a study level you will have to pay for one. I ve never done it but the have a plane editor. X plane also allows you to build a plane from scratch. However with a little bit of time you can modify them yourself or search the internet and get one to download. Be it freeware or payware.Īlot of airports are barren. Tl dr You will probably not be very excited about what you get out of the box with either X-plane or FSX, but with a few additional products, you’ll easily find another way to spend all that extra free time you have laying around. Don’t forget to check to see if you’ll need/want to spend additional money for support tools that will further improve your experience - flight planning tools, passenger/cargo utilities, AI aircraft, AI air traffic control, etc. That said, if you’re looking to get the feeling of flying an aircraft and managing realistically complex systems in flight, do your homework on the quality of the different products out there and be prepared to spend some good money on a single aircraft. I am very pleased with all my purchases (even though the FSL Concorde X still has some bugs in it). I ended up pulling the trigger on Concorde, but soon realized I needed a good weather update (REX & ActiveSky) and airport upgrades (UK2000 Heathrow) to really enjoy the scene out the window. Just the types of add-ons out there is staggering: lighting mods, terrain mods, cloud mods, weather mods, camera control mods, flight planning mods, etc.Īs an example, I fell in love with the idea of a super complex aircraft like the PMDG 737NGX and Flight Sim Labs’ Concorde X. Most (if not all?) of the products has referred to in his Xplane articles are additional purchases that have their own varying level of flight model and system quality, and equally varying value. The power of these two civilian sims, however, is the immense library of 3rd party addons and tools. In fact, a quip I heard once is that “DCS is an aircraft simluator, FSX is an airport simulator”, and I think that sums it up. Terrain is a huge difference between the two - civ sims generally have the entire world modeled to about the same or better quality than default DCS/Falcon terrain - meshes, airport graphics, etc. My understanding is that FSX lags behind Xplane in that regard, for default planes, but that’s probably a whole flame war waiting to happen. The core civilian sim is typically very light on systems and generally has good flight models. My experience is with FSX, but I think the comparison between FSX/Xplane and DCS/Falcon is similar:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |